Advanced

Beyond basic fact-checking

Fact-checking is a complex, evidence-based process which goes beyond simple verification, demanding critical thinking, contextual analysis, and ethical awareness.

The aim is to combat misinformation and promote informed decision-making.

This site already has a piece about the basics of fact-checking and adding context, this article is a combination of two former articles on the site which looked at fact-checking in more depth.

Beyond simple verification

Fact-checking, at its core, is more than a binary exercise of labelling information as “true” or “false.”

It’s a rigorous, often intricate process of evaluating claims against verifiable evidence, contextualising information, and understanding the motivations behind its dissemination.

In a world saturated with information, the ability to discern truth from falsehood is not merely a skill, but a civic responsibility.

We live in an era where trust is constantly challenged. The proliferation of misinformation and disinformation – intentional falsehoods designed to deceive – erodes the foundations of informed decision-making and democratic institutions.

While a simple error might be inconsequential, the systemic spread of manipulated narratives can fuel societal division, empower authoritarianism, and undermine public health.

Fortunately, the tools and techniques used for fact-checking are increasingly accessible. Yet, it’s crucial to acknowledge the limitations.

Not every claim is empirically verifiable. Intentions, predictions, and subjective opinions fall outside the realm of fact-checking. Our focus must remain on claims grounded in observable, verifiable evidence.

The digital revolution has democratised information gathering, empowering citizen investigators to challenge established narratives. However, this democratisation also presents challenges.

Anyone can become a distributor of information, blurring the lines between credible journalism and unsubstantiated claims.

This underscores the urgency of cultivating a “fact-checker’s mindset”—a critical and analytical approach that transcends mere tool usage.

Cultivating a fact-checker’s mindset

This mindset involves:

Skepticism and curiosity: Approaching information with a healthy dose of skepticism, driven by a genuine desire to understand the truth.
Contextual analysis: Examining claims within their broader context, considering the source, the intended audience, and the potential motivations behind the information’s dissemination.
Evidence-based reasoning: Relying on verifiable evidence from credible sources, rather than personal biases or assumptions.
Ethical awareness: Understanding the potential impact of fact-checking on individuals and society, and adhering to principles of fairness and transparency.
Collaborative spirit: Recognising the value of collaboration in fact-checking, and the importance of verifying the verifiers.

The fact-checking process: A deeper dive

Selection and prioritisation:

Choosing claims that serve the public interest. Consider the potential impact of the information and its relevance to critical societal issues.
Recognising the amplified influence of public figures. Claims made by politicians, celebrities, and other influential individuals warrant careful scrutiny.
Distinguishing between deliberate falsehoods and unintentional errors. Parody and satire should be recognised and understood.

Archiving and documentation

Preserving the original source material. This is crucial for maintaining a record of the claim and preventing its disappearance.
Documenting the fact-checking process meticulously. This ensures transparency and allows for replication.

Research and verification

Employing diverse research methods, including keyword searches, reverse image searches, and expert consultations.
Utilising open-source tools for geolocation and video analysis.
Prioritising credible sources, such as reputable news organisations, academic institutions, and government agencies.
Using human sources, and recognising the importance of proper interviewing techniques.
Understanding that video verification is complex, and requires a variety of tools and skills.

Analysis and interpretation

Evaluating the credibility of sources and the strength of evidence.
Recognising the nuances of language and the potential for manipulation.
Acknowledging the limitations of fact-checking and the possibility of ambiguity.
Understanding the difference between misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation.

Publication and dissemination

Presenting findings in a clear, concise, and accessible manner.
Providing sufficient context to help readers understand the significance of the fact-check.
Being transparent about the fact-checking process and the sources used.
Understanding the importance of correction policies.
Understanding the difference between pre and post publication fact checking.

The challenges and responsibilities of fact-checking

The speed of disinformation: Fact-checkers often struggle to keep pace with the rapid spread of false information.
The complexity of truth: Many claims fall into a “grey area,” requiring nuanced analysis and careful language.
The weaponisation of fact-checking: Fact-checking can be used to silence dissent or manipulate public opinion.
The impact on mental health: Exposure to graphic and disturbing content can take a toll on fact-checkers.
Digital security and personal safety: Fact-checkers must protect themselves from online harassment and digital attacks.
Bias: Fact checkers must be aware of their own bias, and work to mitigate it.

Ethical considerations and best practices

Transparency: Clearly disclose the methods and sources used in the fact-checking process.
Impartiality: Strive for objectivity and avoid personal biases.
Accuracy: Ensure that all information presented is accurate and verifiable.
Accountability: Be willing to admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
Safety: Take necessary precautions to protect your digital security and mental well-being.

The future of fact-checking

Fact-checking is an evolving field, constantly adapting to new technologies and challenges. It requires a collaborative effort from journalists, researchers, educators, and citizens alike. By fostering media literacy and critical thinking skills, we can empower individuals to become discerning consumers of information and build a more informed and resilient society.

Questions

What is the primary aim of fact-checking?
How does the text define the process of fact-checking beyond simple verification?
Why is cultivating a “fact-checker’s mindset” important in today’s information landscape?
List three components of a “fact-checker’s mindset”.
Explain the significance of archiving and documentation in the fact-checking process.
What are some of the research methods used in fact-checking?
How does the text differentiate between misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation?
Discuss the challenges fact-checkers face in keeping up with the speed of disinformation.
What ethical considerations should fact-checkers keep in mind during their work?
How does the text suggest fact-checking can contribute to a more informed and resilient society?

Answers

The primary aim of fact-checking is to combat misinformation and promote informed decision-making.
Fact-checking is described as a rigorous process of evaluating claims against verifiable evidence, contextualising information, and understanding the motivations behind its dissemination.
Cultivating a “fact-checker’s mindset” is important because it helps individuals discern truth from falsehood in an era where trust is constantly challenged by misinformation and disinformation.
Three components of a “fact-checker’s mindset” are skepticism and curiosity, contextual analysis, and evidence-based reasoning.
Archiving and documentation are significant because they preserve the original source material and ensure transparency, allowing for the replication of the fact-checking process.
Some research methods used in fact-checking include keyword searches, reverse image searches, expert consultations, and the use of open-source tools for geolocation and video analysis.
Misinformation is false information spread without harmful intent, disinformation is false information spread with the intent to deceive, and malinformation is true information used maliciously.
Fact-checkers face challenges in keeping up with the speed of disinformation because false information spreads rapidly, often outpacing the ability to verify and correct it.
Ethical considerations for fact-checkers include transparency, impartiality, accuracy, accountability, and safety.
The text suggests that fact-checking can contribute to a more informed and resilient society by fostering media literacy and critical thinking skills, empowering individuals to become discerning consumers of information.

Lesson plan for trainers

If you are a trainer of journalists we have a free lesson plan: ‘Beyond basic fact-checking‘ which you are welcome to download and adapted for your own purposes.